The large issue: Using routine as punishment

LEFT: Acquittals all round: Chutima Sidasathian and Alan Morison outward a PHuket Provincial Court. (EPA photo) |
RIGHT: Not-so-red handed: Naritsarawan Kaewnopparat had her fingerprints taken final week after being charged with defamation. (Photo by Pornpen KhongkachonKiet)

Three years ago final month, a two-person website published an essay in a pair’s stability coverage of tellurian trafficking, and a roles of Thai agencies and phuyai in a contemptible business. The fallout from that essay widespread ripples, now waves opposite a many simple polite rights and freedoms — press, speech, recourse.

Three years ago final month, a two-person website published an essay in a pair’s stability coverage of tellurian trafficking, and a roles of Thai agencies and phuyai in a contemptible business. The fallout from that essay widespread ripples, now waves opposite a many simple polite rights and freedoms — press, speech, recourse.

The box of Alan Morison and Chutima Sidasathian, editor and contributor of a Phuketwan website, became famous worldwide, after a Royal Thai Navy officer charged them with rapist insult and violations of a Computer Crime Act. Pretty good everybody knows that a rapist probity in Phuket served probity to Morison and Chutima — exculpation opposite a board. The box was so ridiculous and punitive that a prosecutor refused to uncover adult for a second and final days. It was a outrageous feat for a army of good.

Well, not so fast. Before a decision, a reporters had already announced they were giving up. The lawsuit altered their lives, sapped their energy, stole their morale. Phuketwan folded, both pulled adult stakes.

That was 11 months ago. Fast forward, 5 and a half months, to Feb of 2016.

Three of a country’s heading polite rights activists called a medium press conference. They were … well, they are:

Somchai Homla-or, lawyer, long-time rights fighter, commissioner of a Law Reform Commission, secretary-general of a Human Rights and Development Foundation, member of a National Human Rights Commission;

Anchana Heemmina, Muslim, southerner, owner of Duay Jai Group that she shaped to assistance to rehabilitate and support woe victims and their families;

Porpen Khongkaconkiet, tellurian rights lawyer, executive of a Cross Cultural Foundation that has promoted and monitored tellurian rights given 2002. She was recently allocated as Amnesty International’s deputy in Thailand.

At a press conference, they handed out an intensely modest, intolerable pamphlet called, simply and descriptively, Torture. It minute a famous contribution and personal testimony of victims in 54 cases of indignity by state agents in a low South. In many (but not all) cases, “state agent” is synonymously related with a Royal Thai Army’s ambiguous Internal Security Operations Command (Isoc).

Repeat, that was in February. In May, during a second anniversary of a coup, Isoc submitted a censure of rapist insult opposite a 3 activists, in their purpose as co-editors of Torture.

Isoc might be lightproof, though a commander and a central orator are good known. The personality is (retired) Gen Prayut Chan-o-cha. Its open front is tellurian Col Pramote Prom-in, who explained Isoc had harm feelings and was forced to sue since there was no torture, ever. “You can’t contend they were tortured [although] some of them might have postulated scratches or bruises while perplexing to shun detain or raids.”

Then, a third box or, chronologically, a initial case.

In 2011, tender army inductee Pvt Wichian Puaksom was beaten to genocide during a Krom Luang Naradhiwas Rajanagarindra Military Camp for being a poor-performing recruit. Twelve of his dauntless troops superiors kicked, kick and pummelled him and walked divided since they their avocation was done. This is true.

The army paid blood income to Wichian’s family, though his niece Naritsarawan Kaewnopparat elite justice. After training a army had no goal of posterior any critical charges, let alone murder, she took a story and photos to a Bangkok Post Sunday. Spectrum repository laid out a fear story on Jul 24, 2011, with follow-up stories as a box never progressed.

Last week, military arrested Ms Naritsarawan on charges that were filed in Feb by a former Isoc commander in a low South, who now claims she harm his feelings by articulate to this newspaper.

Like a navy commander who brought a Phuketwan case, Isoc and a former Isoc commander seem doubtful to win these cases in court. Which is a point.

The cases are not about justice, harm feelings or convalescent reputations mislaid to defame and slander. The rapist insult law, dissipated for decades by politicians and phuyai, represents long, stressful punishment for a accused. Just final week, a 3 polite rights activists had to transport to Pattani to acknowledge a charges opposite them, while Ms Naritsarawan was led away, taken by military from her life in Bangkok to a South, to be rigourously charged.

The genuine punishment in such cases won’t be a outcome during a finish of long, drawn-out, energy-sapping and costly probity cases for these defendants. The routine itself, being forced to attend in such old-fashioned authorised proceedings, is a whole punishment sought by a litigious officers of Isoc. Some call it revenge.

Article source: http://www.bangkokpost.com/opinion/opinion/1049005/the-big-issue-using-process-as-punishment

Leave a Reply